CASE STUDIES

The evidence
behind the intelligence.

Explore published evaluations of giles® in healthcare and medical research. See the methods, results and context for yourself.

EVIDENCE OF WHAT’S POSSIBLE

94%

Average extraction accuracy

85%

Less manual effort, up to

0.98

Agreement with manual SLR

40+

Languages supported

Extraction results from the published R-S-S atopic dermatitis case study. Performance varies by source material and workflow.

GILES® × R-S-S

Evidence.
Extracted.
Evaluated.

SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

RESEARCH IN PRACTICE

AI-driven data extraction for faster evidence generation.

An evaluation comparing giles® with manual extraction of key outcomes from atopic dermatitis publications.

13Published articles

1,166Data points extracted

The study reports approximately 94% average accuracy for EASI outcome extraction. Findings relate to this evaluation, not all research tasks.

ISPOR EUROPE 2025

Review the study objective, methodology and results in the published research poster.

REAL RESEARCH. REAL IMPACT.

Regulatory Scientific
& Health Solutions

“By integrating giles® into our SLR workflow, we reduced the manual effort by up to 85%.”

Prof/Dr. Iftekhar KhanAdvisory Board Chair, R-S-S

THE NEXT CHAPTER STARTS HERE

Let’s see what you and giles® can discover.